Sian Cain, Richard Lea and Alison Flood 

Nobel prize in literature 2017: Kazuo Ishiguro wins – as it happened

This year’s prize has been awarded to the British author of The Remains of the Day and Never Let Me Go
  
  

Novelist Kazuo Ishiguro.
Novelist Kazuo Ishiguro. Photograph: Sarah Lee/The Guardian

Thanks for joining us!

We’re wrapping up now – thanks for following our live coverage. Here’s our full news story and some reading/listening material, for both the Ishigurus (my newly coined term, to match Murakami’s ardent Harukists) and the readers among you who have yet to discover him (you’re in for a treat):

Ishiguro reacts: 'I’m in the footsteps of the greatest authors that have lived'

Speaking to the BBC, the author has called the award a “magnificent honour, mainly because it means that I’m in the footsteps of the greatest authors that have lived”.

“The world is in a very uncertain moment and I would hope all the Nobel prizes would be a force for something positive in the world as it is at the moment,” he said. “I’ll be deeply moved if I could in some way be part of some sort of climate this year in contributing to some sort of positive atmosphere at a very uncertain time.”

Ishiguro, who was born in Nagasaki, lived in England for almost 30 years before he made his first trip back to to Japan in 1989. He reportedly wasn’t aware of his home town’s significance as the target of a US atomic bomb in August 1945 until reading about it in a British textbook.

Despite this detachment from his country of birth, Japan features prominently in Ishiguro’s first novel, A Pale View of Hills, which is set in Nagasaki and England.

His second novel, An Artist of the Floating World, centres on Masuji Ono, a once respected artist who, in postwar Japan, must come to terms with his support for the country’s doomed militarist adventurism during the first half of the 20th century.
Britain’s selective memory regarding its imperial past also applies to Japan, Ishiguro said in a 2015 interview with the Asian American Writers’ Workshop.

“In Japan – and I’m very distant from Japan, so I’m looking at this from a great distance – but there has always been this conflict with China and Southeast Asia about the history of the second world war,” he said.

“The Japanese have decided to forget that they were aggressors and all the things that the Japanese imperial army did in China and south Asia in those years.”

Updated

Updated

'A fairly good writer': Will Self reacts

Self, in typically lugubrious form, has emailed: “He’s a fairly good writer, and surely doesn’t deserve the dread ossification and disregard that garnishes such laurels.”

'How does he do it?' – Andrew Motion on Ishiguro's win

The former UK poet laureate Andrew Motion says: “Ishiguro’s imaginative world has the great virtue and value of being simultaneously highly individual and deeply familiar – a world of puzzlement, isolation, watchfulness, threat and wonder.”

“How does he do it?” asked Motion. “Among other means, by resting his stories on founding principles which combine a very fastidious kind of reserve with equally vivid indications of emotional intensity. It’s a remarkable and fascinating combination, and wonderful to see it recognised by the Nobel prize-givers.”

Updated

The first fantasy writer winner?

When Ishiguro’s last book, The Buried Giant came out, many were excited for what was anticipated to be his first foray into fantasy writing. But Ishiguro was concerned about his readers’ reaction to his new direction, telling the New York Times: “Will readers follow me into this? Will they understand what I’m trying to do, or will they be prejudiced against the surface elements? Are they going to say this is fantasy?”

A bit of literary fisticuffs ensued, with Le Guin quickly responding in a sharply worded blog post: “Well, yes, they probably will. Why not? It appears that the author takes the word for an insult.”

“I had no idea this was going to be such an issue,” Ishiguro later said at a Guardian Bookclub event. “Everything I read about [The Buried Giant], it’s all, ‘Oh, he’s got a dragon in his book, ’or ‘I so liked his previous books, but I don’t know if I’ll like this one’. [Le Guin]’s entitled to like my book or not like my book, but as far as I am concerned she’s got the wrong person. I am on the side of the pixies and the dragons.”

However, even if he had laid claim to the term, Ishiguro wouldn’t be the first writer of fantasy to win: Rudyard Kipling, Maurice Maeterlinck, Hermann Hesse (The Glass Bead Game) and Isaac Bashevis Singer (who wrote short stories featuring ghosts and devils).

There are also laureates who wrote speculative fiction – which Ishiguro is also known for since his 2005 novel Never Let Me Go: Doris Lessing (Canopus in Argos), José Saramago (Blindness) and Nadine Gordimer (July’s People).

Updated

'Roll over Bob Dylan': Salman Rushdie on Ishiguro's win

Salman Rushdie, a friend of Ishiguro, has sent his thoughts to us:

“Many congratulations to my old friend Ish, whose work I’ve loved and admired ever since I first read A Pale View of Hills. And he plays the guitar and writes songs, too! Roll over Bob Dylan.”

Updated

Our Japan correspondent Justin McCurry says:

Ishiguro was born in Nagasaki, southwestern Japan, and moved to Britain with his parents and two sisters in 1960, when he was aged five. Many Japanese will be familiar with the 1993 film adaptation of Remains of the Day, but the mood in the country of Ishiguro’s birth is likely to be one of disappointment that Haruki Murakami has missed out on the Nobel prize yet again.

Updated

Here is the man in his own words, on writing his 1989 Booker winner The Remains of the Day:

A choice to 'make the world happy'

At the announcement, the academy’s Sara Danius described Ishiguro’s style as a mix of Jane Austen and Franz Kafka, adding: “But you have to add a little bit of Marcel Proust into the mix, and then you stir, but not too much, and then you have his writings.”

“He’s a writer of great integrity. He doesn’t look to the sidee’s developed an aesthetic universe all his own,” she said. Danius says her favourite Ishiguro novel is The Buried Giant, but called The Remains of the Day “a true masterpiece, which starts as a PG Wodehouse novel and ends as something Kafkaesque”.

“He is very interested in understanding the past, but he is not a Proustian writer – he is not out to redeem the past, he is exploring what you have to forget in order to survive in the first place, as an individual or as a society,” she said, adding – in the wake of last year’s uproar about Dylan – that she hoped the choice would “make the world happy”.

“That’s not for me to judge. We’ve just chosen what we think is an absolutely brilliant novelist,” she said.

Updated

The Academy has praised Ishiguro, the author of novels including The Remains of the Day and Never Let Me Go, and his writing as “marked by a carefully restrained mode of expression, independent of whatever events are taking place”.

Ishiguro is the 114th winner, following in the footsteps of Seamus Heaney, Toni Morrison, Mo Yan and Pablo Neruda.

Updated

(Ishiguro is a very serious guitar player, one of his many talents.)

Updated

Strangely enough, the last time the Guardian interviewed Ishiguro was not for a book, but for a science exhibition – the show featured a machine to predict coastal storm surges built by his oceanographer father.

Kazuo Ishiguro is the 2017 Nobel literature laureate

What a surprise – although perhaps not such a big one after Dylan last year. Ishiguro was not a favourite to win, but he is renowned as a novelist – particularly for his 1989 novel The Remains of the Day, for which he won the Man Booker.

Updated

The winner is...

The UK’s Kazuo Ishiguro!

Updated

We’re getting close! In the meantime, lets admire the academy’s taste in doors.

Updated

This usually isn’t a bad way of predicting the winner:

(Or if it is a woman, the least translated into English)

It seems Margaret Atwood is the last minute favourite with readers, according to the bookies. Ladbrokes said that this year had been their busiest prize, in terms of amount staked, with Atwood the most popular writer. She was at 6/1 but is now amongst the favourites at 7/2 in the final minutes of betting.

A Ladbrokes spokesperson said: “literary punters think this year’s prize is hand-made for Atwood”.

Oof.

Author Hari Kunzru is still a bit gloomy after Dylan’s win last year.

(Me too, Hari.)

Updated

Another perennial favourite is Haruki Murakami:

Known for his existential, experimental novels (which often feature his love for cats and for women with nice earlobes), Murakami was born in Japan in 1949 and began writing when he was 29. His most famous novels include Norwegian Wood (1987); The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle (1994-95) and Kafka on the Shore (2002).

Our very own Steven Poole once praised Murakami as “among the world’s greatest living novelists”. Murakami makes it on to the favourites list every year – and every year, “Harukists” (ardent Murakami fans) head to bars in Japan, hopefully waiting for their beloved author’s name to finally be called. If it doesn’t happen this year, at least they have the solace of liquor.

Updated

Here’s a lovely document: Albert Camus’s letter to his teacher, thanking him after his Nobel win in 1957.

The Chinese novelist and short story writer Yan Lianke is also a favourite:

Yan, who hails from Henan province, has won the Hua Zhong World Chinese Literature prize, the Lao She Literary award and the Franz Kafka prize. His novel The Explosion Chronicles, about a rural village which becomes a megalopolis, was longlisted for this year’s Man Booker International prize. He has previously been shortlisted twice for the award, last year for his novel The Four Books, set in a Mao-era labour camp. Last year, judges for the Man Booker International called him “one of China’s boldest living writers”.

Updated

Now the South Korean author and poet, Ko Un:

Described by Allen Ginsberg as “a magnificent poet, combination of Buddhist cognoscente, passionate political libertarian, and naturalist historian”, the Korean poet Ko Un is the author of more than 150 collections of poems, essays and fiction, and has long been named as a potential Nobel laureate. He became a Buddhist monk after the horrors of the Korean war and wrote his first few collections while under holy orders, going on to become a political activist, during which time he was arrested and imprisoned repeatedly. Andrew Motion has described him as “a major poet, who has absolutely compelling things to say about the entire history of South Korea, and equally engrossing things to say about his own exceptionally interesting life and sensibility”.

Now for Margaret Atwood, arguably the most famous name on this year’s list.

Atwood has had a doozy of a year with the very successful television adaptation of her 1985 novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, and another to come in Alias Grace, due on Netflix next month. The Canadian novelist, who is 77, is known for weaving searing political commentary into her novels, most often environmentalism and feminism. She won the Man Booker prize in 2000 for her novel The Blind Assassin, and has been nominated four other times. Her most recent novel, Hag-Seed, is a retelling of Shakespeare’s play The Tempest.

Updated

Let’s have a look at the current favourites, starting with Ngugi wa Thiong’o

Born in Kenya in 1938, Ngugi wa Thiong’o published his first novel, Weep Not Child, in 1964. When he started working with a local theatre group and writing in the Gikuyu language, he was arrested in 1977 and held in Mamiti Maximum Security Prison for a year without trial. “In prison I began to think in a more systematic way about language,” he told the Guardian in 2006. “Why was I not detained before, when I wrote in English?” He carried on writing and publishing in Gikuyu, even after his exile in 1982. He is now a professor of English and comparative literature at the University of California. His last novel, translated in English as Wizard of the Crow, was published in 2006.

It has been pointed out online that the Academy may be hinting at a female winner this year, by tweeting this picture of the 14 women laureates (they did the same when Svetlana Alexievich won in 2015):

But the Academy are notoriously hard to predict. Perhaps the selection of Bob Dylan was the first salvo in a campaign to take literature back to the streets. After all, the arguments in favour of considering Dylan as a poet apply equally straightforwardly to rap music, and arguably with more force. Step forward the self-styled King of the Streets, Grandmaster Melle Mel, who Sara Danius will agree has been working “not just the written tradition, but also the oral one; not just high literature, but also low literature” since the 1980s, when he performed “often together with instruments” on tracks such as The Message, Step Off and White Lines (Don’t Don’t Do It). If the trailblazing vigour of Melle Mel is too much for the committee, then maybe they’ll opt for the dizzying inventiveness of Missy Elliott or the linguistic dexterity of MC Solaar. It is, however, a literary award, so it’s difficult to see past the mesmeric economy of Salt-N-Pepa, as exemplified in their 1986 hit Push It:

Ah, push it - push it good
Ah, push it - push it real good
Ah, push it - push it good
Ah, push it - p-push it real good

Last year, Bob Dylan’s odds shot from 50/1 to 10/1 just before the announcement. This year, according to the betting data site Smart Bets, which assesses odds based on the whole market, “the writer with the same momentum” is the South Korean poet Ko Un, who has moved from 33/1 to 10/1.

“It has definitely paid to follow the money over recent years when it comes to identifying the winner of the prize. Plenty of literary pundits scoffed at the idea of Bob Dylan being a contender, but they were made to eat humble pie by those watching market fluctuations,” said Smartbets.com’s Alexander Kostin.

“The literary betting public [is] seemingly very confident in the Korean poet, who has been a mainstay in the betting lists for considerable time. As for Murakami, the day he finally wins bookmakers will be made to pay by his army of fans. But my suspicion is that they will miss out again.”

Updated

Mũkoma wa Ngũgĩ, author and son of consistent Nobel favourite Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, has a new technique:

Updated

Think twice, it wasn't alright: authors on Bob Dylan's win

When Dylan was announced as the 2016 winner, the Swedish Academy’s Sara Danius immediately anticipated the furrowed brows and launched straight into his literary credentials.

“If you look back, far back, you discover Homer and Sappho, and they wrote poetic texts that were meant to be listened to,” she said. “They were meant to be performed. It’s the same way with Bob Dylan. But we still read Homer and Sappho. He can be read and should be read.”

A lot of authors, who can also be read and also should be read, were less than impressed.

Hari Kunzru: “This feels like the lamest Nobel win since they gave it to Obama for not being Bush.”

Reza Aslan: “I’m sorry but this is total bullshit.”

Will Self, was more sanguine (about Bob, not the Nobel):

“My only caveat about the award is that it cheapens Dylan to be associated at all with a prize founded on an explosives and armaments fortune, and more often awarded to a buggins whose turn it is than a world-class creative artist. Really, it’s a bit like when Sartre was awarded the Nobel – he was primarily a philosopher, and had the nous to refuse it. Hopefully Bob will follow his lead.”

(He didn’t).

Updated

Welcome to our live coverage for the 2017 Nobel prize in literature

Hello and welcome to the Guardian’s coverage of the Nobel prize in literature. Introduced as part of a swathe of awards by 19th-century industrialist Alfred Nobel in 1901, the literature prize is either the most prestigious award in books, or as Irvine Welsh put it last year: “An ill-conceived nostalgia award wrenched from the rancid prostates of senile, gibbering hippies.”

Earlier this week, medals were awarded in physics, medicine, and chemistry. Unlike last year, the literature medal is being awarded in the same week as the rest of the prizes. At the time, the academy’s Per Wästberg denied gossip that the week-long delay was due to members disagreeing over the proposed winner; later, the prize would go to the determinedly elusive singer songwriter Bob Dylan.

This year the prize is worth 9m Swedish krona (£832,000) – 1m more than last year. We’ll be here to tell you who the 114th winner is at 12noon BST (1pm Central European Time). When that happens, we’ll either explain who they are or watch bemusedly as literary celebrity is showered on Kenny Loggins, who knows.

 

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*

*